After blogging my thoughts on ethics in my work place, I consulted the Essex Dance Theatre – Staff Handbook and Quality Control to establish the ethical framework and codes of practice.
In the handbook it has a section on teaching methods, offering guidelines on overall aims, physical aims, musical aims, use of voice and how to give teaching points and corrections, as well as division of teacher’s attention. These types of guidelines are put in place to achieve continuity throughout the school; every child is different and will view certain situations differently I believe by having structured teaching methods a child can start to understand boundaries and how a class situation takes place, once boundaries are formed a child can learn in a creative relaxed environment.
There is a section in the handbook entitled -Serve difficulties between staff and student. This looks at serve difficulties of a working relationship between a member of staff and a student and when attitude and behaviour interfere with the atmosphere and working conditions within the studio. It outlines 6 steps that should be taken in order to resolve these issues the first is to try and ensure the issue is resolved in a private discussion at the end of the class. Although there are 6 clear steps in how the issue should be dealt with it still requires both a personal and professional ethical approach. How you actually deal with the situation is primarily down to you as a teacher to solve the issue in accordance with your personal ethics.
The Handbook notes that ‘there are times during any senior students training when the ‘ups and downs’ of growing up mean some students may have trouble with ETD rules and the expectations of behaviour and attitude.’ I think children will always push boundaries in order to establish, build and understand what is right and wrong; this is part of growing up. It is my job as a teacher to be consistent in order for my students to know where to draw the line.
In the code of professional conduct- Fundamental Principles it notes that ‘A tutor should strive for objectivity in all professional and business judgements.’ The word objective is to not be influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts. (Oxford Dictionary, 2011) I like the use of the word strive for, personality I operate whereby my emotions play a huge part in the making of my decisions. Can this be linked to expression and my comfort zones, as I find it easier expressing myself through movement and dance.
A comment Adesola noted on my developing questions was- why academic and practical seem juxtaposed. Looking into the philosophy of the mind and body- my question is can the body affect the mind?
Reverting back to objectivity and dealing with the facts rather than personal feelings should we, as teachers try to refrain from asking normative questions when dealing with difficulties. By asking factual questions can we eliminate confrontation, as normative questions fuel many opinions on one subject and all are equal and valid? Asking the right kind of question can prevent the difficulties from escalating further- Did you talk when I was talking? As opposed to why did you talk when I was talking?
I would be interested to know your thoughts on the mind and body philosophy? and if you can see any links? I know the mind, body dualism stems from the French philosoher Rene Descartes, so I might need to start my research with him.


